000			02179nam a22003257a 4500
005			20241204153126.0
008			241204b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9781009001274
082			_a610.68 _bPAU
100			_aPauly, Mark _919306
245			_aSeemed like a good idea: _balchemy versus evidence-based approaches to healthcare management innovation
260			_bCambridge University Press _aNew York _c2022
300			_axii, 412 p.
365			_aGBP _b34.99
520			_aConsumers, public officials, and even managers of health care and insurance are unhappy about care quality, access, and costs. This book shows that is because efforts to do something about these problems often rely on hope or conjecture, not rigorous evidence of effectiveness. In this book, experts in the field separate the speculative from the proven with regard to how care is rendered, how patients can be in control, how providers should be paid, and how disparities can be reduced – and they also identify the issues for which evidence is currently missing. It provides an antidote to frustration and a clear-eyed guide for forward progress, helping health care and insurance innovators make better decisions on deciding whether to go ahead now based on current evidence, to seek and wait for additional evidence, or to move on to different ideas. It will be useful to practitioners in hospital systems, medical groups, and insurance organizations and can also be used in executive and MBA teaching. (https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/seemed-like-a-good-idea/AB3914A4E58B7A58AFBE5AC7739B9292#fndtn-information)
650			_aEvidence-based medicine _919307
650			_aBISAC : Business and Economics--Entrepreneurship _919308
650			_aHealth services administration
700			_aWinston, Flaura _919309
700			_aNaylor, Mary _919310
700			_aVolpp, Kevin _919311
700			_aBurns, Lawton Robert _919312
700			_aRalph Muller _919313
700			_aAsch, David _919314
700			_aWerner, Rachel _919315
700			_aDesai, Bimal _919316
700			_aChaiyachati, Krisda _919317
700			_aChartock,, Benjamin _919318
942			_cBK _2ddc
999			_c7653 _d7653