000			02165nam a22002057a 4500
999			_c3078 _d3078
005			20220818110416.0
008			220810b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9788194568650
082			_a347.5406 _bLAL
100			_aLal, Batuk _97812
245			_aThe law of evidence
250			_a23rd
260			_bCentral Law Agency _aAllahabad _c2022
300			_alxiv, 717 p.
365			_aINR _b580.00
504			_aContents Part I : Relevancy of Facts 1. Preliminary 2. Of the Relevancy of Facts Part II : On Proof 3. Facts which need not be proved 4. Of oral Evidence 5. Of Documentary evidence 6. Of the exclusion of Oral by Documentary Evidence Part III : Production and Effect of Evidence 7. Of the Burden of Proof 8. Estoppel 9. Of Witnesses 10. Of the Examination of Witnesses 11. Of Improper admission and Rejection of Evidence The Schedule (Repealed)
520			_aDescription As a revising author, I feel pleasure to place twenty second edition of Batuk Lal's The Law of Evidence, a legal classic, for the law students, P.C.S. (J.), A.P.O. and HJ.S. examinees. With the inflow of cases decided by judiciary, it is difficult to limit the size of the book but in the interest of the students only important cases have been discussed to avoid the bulk. Some of the cases given in this edition are as follows : In Sheikh Sintha Madhar alias Jaffer alias Sintha v. State, AIR 2016 SC 1844, the Supreme Court held—There is no invariable rule that the two accused persons cannot be made part of the same Test Identification Parade. Joint Test Identification Parade does in no manner affect the validity of Test Identification Parade. The purpose of the Test Identification Parade is that the investigation is going on the right track and is merely corroborative evidence. In State of U.P. v. Sunil, AIR 2017 SC 2154, the Supreme Court held—There can be no conviction founded on the sole circumstance of recovery of weapon and other articles if the basic foundation of prosecution crumbles down by not connecting the accused with the incident in question.
650			_aEvidence (Law) _98367
942			_2ddc _cBK