000 | 01427nam a22002057a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c2577 _d2577 |
||
005 | 20220810110134.0 | ||
008 | 220701b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781108738880 | ||
082 |
_a320.98 _bBRI |
||
100 |
_aBrinks, Daniel M. _97232 |
||
245 | _aUnderstanding institutional weakness: power and design in latin American institutions | ||
260 |
_bCambridge University Press _aNew York _c2019 |
||
300 | _a68 p. | ||
365 |
_aGBP _b15.00 |
||
504 | _aTable of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Defining institutions 3. Institutional weakness 4. Accounting for institutional weakness 5. The persistence of institutional weakness in Latin America 6. Conclusion. | ||
520 | _aThis Element introduces the concept of institutional weakness, arguing that weakness or strength is a function of the extent to which an institution actually matters to social, economic or political outcomes. It then presents a typology of three forms of institutional weakness: insignificance, in which rules are complied with but do not affect the way actors behave; non-compliance, in which state elites either choose not to enforce the rules or fail to gain societal cooperation with them; and instability, in which the rules are changed at an unusually high rate. The Element then examines the sources of institutional weakness. | ||
700 |
_aLevitsky, Steven _97233 |
||
700 |
_aMurillo, Maria Victoria _97144 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |