000			01922nam a22002297a 4500
999			_c2573 _d2573
005			20220628145347.0
008			220628b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9781108733762
082			_a327.17 _bKOR
100			_aKornprobst, Markus _96455
245			_aCo-managing international crises: judgments and justifications
260			_bCambridge University Press _aNew York _c2019
300			_axiii, 334 p.
365			_aGBP _b26.99
504			_aTable of Contents Introduction 1. Judgments and justifications 2. Constellation 3. Bosnia and Herzegovina 4. Kosovo 5. Afghanistan 6. Iraq Conclusion.
520			_aMarkus Kornprobst examines the common assumption that states usually respond to crises individually, rather than together. He develops an innovative approach to analyse how crisis co-management comes to succeed or fail. He argues that actors draw from repertoires of taken-for-granted ideas, forming a set of pre-judgments. These are then revisited in justificatory encounters, making various degrees of co-management possible or impossible. This judging and justifying in turn leaves an impression on repertoires put to use for co-managing the next crisis. The author uses this model to analyse the attempts by France, Germany and the United Kingdom to co-manage the crises in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq. He links individual reasoning and communication, paving the way for further research into crisis co-management, and providing novel insights into European attempts to act in international affairs. Introduces the concept of crisis co-management Develops an innovative theoretical framework Includes in-depth empirical research
650			_aEuropean Union countries _96980
650			_aDiplomatic relations _96981
650			_aConflict management--International cooperation _96982
650			_aDiplomatic negotiations in international disputes _96983
942			_2ddc _cBK